Plot Summary
Four years after assuming the throne of Atlantis, Arthur Curry (Aquaman) is balancing his dual life: king of the seas and protector of the surface world. He’s married to Mera and they have a young son, Arthur Jr.
Wikipedia
+1
Meanwhile, David Kane / Black Manta remains hell-bent on vengeance for his father’s death. He partners with marine biologist Stephen Shin and uncovers a mythic artifact, the Black Trident, which gives him access to dangerous, ancient Atlantean power.
Wikipedia
+2
dcextendeduniverse.fandom.com
+2
As Black Manta begins using Orichalcum-powered machines, the climate and environment begin to suffer: rising temperatures, ocean acidification, extreme weather—unintended consequences of meddling with a substance that was once forbidden for its catastrophic side-effects.
Wikipedia
+2
IMDb
+2
To stop him, Arthur forges an uneasy alliance with his imprisoned half-brother Orm. Together they journey through pirate havens, volcanic islands mutated by Orichalcum’s influence, and finally to the lost kingdom of Necrus buried under Antarctica. They must rescue Arthur Jr., confront Kordax (an ancient antagonist tied to Atlantis’ history), and destroy the Black Trident. In doing so, Arthur also makes a bold proclamation: he will reveal Atlantis to the surface world in order to unify they and help protect the planet.
Wikipedia
+2
Screen Rant
+2
Notable Elements: What Works & What Doesn’t
What Stands Out / Strengths
Underwater visuals & world-building
As with its predecessor, the film delivers some striking underwater landscapes, fantastical sea creatures, and imaginative environments (e.g. mutated flora/fauna islands, sunken cities) that give the film its sense of scale and wonder. These are moments when the fantasy element really shines.
Action sequences and spectacle
Battles involving underwater chases, Orichalcum machinery, mutated creatures—all of this has a kinetic, almost pulpy energy. For viewers wanting big set-pieces, there are several memorable fights, especially the final confrontation in Necrus, and rescue scenes.
Brotherhood / family tension
The dynamic between Arthur and Orm is emotionally richer than one might expect. The internal family conflict—duty vs resentment, the past, jealousy—is well-threaded. The film leans into themes of redemption and sacrifice via Orm’s arc.
Environmental stakes
Incorporating environmental degradation and climate change through the misuse of Orichalcum gives the movie a more global, serious sense of danger beyond just good vs evil. It grounds some of the fantasy in contemporary themes.
What Falls Short / Weaknesses
Over-stuffed plot & pacing issues
At times, the movie tries to juggle too much—Atlantis politics, family life, climate crisis, mythology, multiple villains. Some threads feel underexplored or rushed. Certain transitions are abrupt.
Villain and artifact clichés
The Black Trident / ancient power trope is familiar, and the notion of freeing a sealed evil (Kordax) is heavily used in fantasy/mythic stories. While the setup has potential, it sometimes leans into generic territory without surprising reinvention.
Under-utilized characters
Some supporting characters, including Mera, are given less to do than one might hope. Their emotional connections feel weaker, and Mera’s screen presence is somewhat reduced in favor of focusing on Arthur and Orm.
EW.com
+2
dcextendeduniverse.fandom.com
+2
Tone inconsistency
The film shifts between epic mythological gravitas and lighter, sometimes even sitcom-style family moments (Arthur’s home life, raising his son) in ways that occasionally undercut tension. The balance doesn’t always work.
Themes & Messages
Unity vs Division (Family, Kingdom, Surface & Underwater Worlds): The film strongly emphasizes that old resentments (between brothers, between Atlantis’ rulers, between surface dwellers and Atlantis) are dangerous in the face of global threats. Arthur’s decision at the end to reveal Atlantis reflects a belief in cooperation.
Environmental Responsibility: The misuse of Orichalcum serves as allegory for reckless exploitation of natural resources. The film warns that ancient power (or technologies) can have unforeseen consequences when repurposed without caution.
Redemption & Forgiveness: Orm’s arc hinges on reconciling with Arthur, rising above jealousy, and ultimately choosing sacrifice and cooperation over continuing conflict.
Heritage & Myth: The mythology of Atlantis, the lost kingdom of Necrus, and the ancestral legacy (Kordax, Atlan’s lineage) all speak to how history shapes the present (for good or ill). Myths and legacy can be sources of power, but also of danger.
Transparency & Leadership: Arthur’s growth involves not just being a ruler underwater but also acknowledging that Atlantis can no longer stay hidden; the world’s problems (rising seas, climate change) affect all. So leadership requires transparency and bridging divides.
While you asked about “holiday traditions or sentiments,” Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom isn’t particularly a holiday film, so those kinds of motifs are absent. However, you could think of it in terms of “coming together,” “renewal,” “redemption,” and “hope for the future” — themes often present in holiday storytelling — especially when Arthur tries to heal divisions and protect the next generation (his son, the planet).
Personal Impressions
I found Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom to be a visually ambitious film with strong moments, especially when it leans into spectacle and myth. Jason Momoa still brings charisma and presence to Aquaman; Patrick Wilson does decent work as Orm, giving the emotional stakes (resentment, rivalry, reconciliation) enough weight that their alliance feels earned. The environmental angle gives the film more relevance than many superhero flicks that stay purely escapist.
That said, I was frustrated by several aspects. The pacing lags in the middle; some scenes feel like padding. The villain’s motivations and the mythic backstory sometimes feel derivative rather than fresh. Character moments—especially involving Mera—could have been deeper; her reduced role makes certain emotional beats less impactful. Also, the tonal shifts occasionally pulled me out of immersion: switching from epic threat to family banter too abruptly.
Overall, I enjoyed the ride but felt the film rarely surprises. It meets expectations more than it exceeds them.
Who Might Enjoy This / Who Might Not
Likely to enjoy:
Viewers who love epic fantasy and mythic world-building with underwater and magical visuals.
Fans of the first Aquaman who want to see the expansion of Atlantis lore and big set pieces.
Those who appreciate superhero films with environmental or political themes intertwined (not just punch-ups).
People who like family / brotherhood conflict as part of the hero’s journey.
Less likely to enjoy:
If you prefer tighter, leaner storytelling or more originality in plot, this may feel overly familiar.
If you want deeper character development across all supporting figures (especially Mera or peripheral characters), you might be disappointed.
If you dislike clichés in fantasy / myth (sealed evil prisons, power artifacts, etc.), this will lean heavily on those tropes.
Conclusion & Final Recommendation
Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom is a grand, occasionally uneven conclusion to the DCEU version of Aquaman. It delivers visual wonder, mythic scope, a strong emotional core in the Arthur‐/Orm relationship, and timely environmental themes. But it also stumbles under its own ambition at times — too many plot threads, some tonal whiplash, and supporting characters that deserved more.
If you go in expecting a fun, action-heavy fantasy spectacle rather than a philosophical masterpiece, you’ll have a good time. It’s not perfect, but it does enough to be worthwhile, especially for fans of the genre.
